This review page is supported in part by the sponsor whose ad is displayed above
|
||||||||||
Reviewer: Paul Candy Source: Rotel RCD-971 as transport, Audio Zone DAC-1, CEC TL53Z CD Player [in for review], Pro-Ject RPM 5 turntable, Pro-Ject Speed Box, Ortofon Rondo Blue cartridge. Preamp/Integrated: Manley Labs Shrimp, Blue Circle BmPH [in for review], Audiomat Opera Reference [in for review], Pro-Ject Tube Box phono stage. Amp: Manley Labs Mahi monoblocks. Speakers: Green Mountain Audio Callisto (on sand filled Skylan stands), (2) REL Q108 Mk II subwoofers, Green Mountain Audio Calypso [in for review], AV123 Strata Mini [in for review]. Cables: Various SilverFi interconnects and Sufi speaker cable, Acoustic Zen Silver Reference interconnects, JPS Labs Superconductor+ interconnects, Auditorium 23 speaker cable, Stereovox XV2 digital, Actinote cable loom [in for review]. Power Cords: Audience, GutWire, Harmonic Technology, DH Labs. Stands: Grand Prix Audio Monaco four-tier rack. Powerline conditioning: BPT Pure Power Center w/Wattgate 381 outlets, Bybee Quantum Purifiers and ERS cloth, GutWire MaxCon, Blue Circle BC6000 [in for review], Blue Circle BC86. Sundry accessories: Grand Prix Audio APEX footers, Herbie's Way Excellent II Turntable Mat, Herbie's Black Hole CD Mat, Herbie's HAL-O tube dampers, Isoclean fuses, Walker Audio SST contact enhancer, Nanotech Intron 8500 CD fluid, Audio Magic/Quantum Physics Noise Disruptors, dedicated AC line with Wattgate 381 outlet, Echo Busters acoustic room treatments. Room size: 11' x 18' x 8', long wall setup, hardwood floors with large area rug. Review Component Retail: $2,680 |
||||||||||
Zero One Audio's Mercury CD/HD Player is essentially their Ti48 transport which John Potis reviewed in December 2005, paired with an onboard DAC. Thus far I have been disappointed with PC-based music systems both sonically and ergonomically. Even relatively inexpensive transport/DAC combos have performed at a higher level than any laptop-desktop-DAC combo I've tried yet. Hard drive or other magnetic-based music storage/playback may be the near future but it is still in its infancy and with plenty of unresolved issues as far as I'm concerned. Frankly, I'm not at all keen on navigating through Windows, MAC or any OS for that matter - plus tweaking settings and managing my music library. I absolutely loath the library features of both iTunes and Windows Media Player. My current music library management system works just fine. I don't need to worry about carpal tunnel syndrome either: I get up from the couch, walk over to my wall unit, pick out a CD or LP and drop it onto its respective player. That's it. Still, if someone could offer a hard-drive based system that outperforms most CD transport systems, without all the kludgy operating systems or the requirement for an add-on monitor, I might just alter my opinion. The Mercury is the first such product that seems to indicate a degree of maturity at hand. Let's find out more. The Mercury arrived well packaged in a sturdy cardboard box. Upon receipt of a review product, I normally remove the cover and snap some pix. However, I couldn't remove this cover as a previous ham-fisted reviewer had stripped the screws. Therefore I had to settle for a photo emailed to me by Zero One's Alvin Heng. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
As you can see, the Mercury is one brute of a CD player and occupies serious real estate on one's rack. It just barely fit on my Grand Prix Audio Monaco. The front panel is completely devoid of controls. You get a display and disc drawer - that's it. I'd have liked a few simple controls such as drawer open/close, play, pause, stop plus a button or two to scroll through the Mercury's various menu selections. You need the remote to access this machine which is why the Mercury ships with two in case you lose or break one. I won't tell you how many times I walked up to the Mercury to change a disc only to walk back to my seat to grab the remote - all the more reason to rip your CDs onto the Mercury's hard drive. I must admit, scrolling through various albums from my seat via remote was indeed handy. On the rear there are the usual RCA outputs, a digital out RCA, the IEC AC inlet and power on/off switch. | ||||||||||
Specs are as follows: |
||||||||||
- Remote control (no monitor or keyboard required for operation) The comprehensive manual, in decent English, fully explained the myriad user settings such as choice of filter, word length, dither and sampling rate, as well as step-by-step instructions on ripping discs and managing the Mercury's music library. Zero One is careful about recommending any specific settings and is content with gently suggesting that users let their ears decide. The manual also points out that because some combinations are technically impossible -- i.e. upsampling to 192kHz without a digital filter -- various number crunching methods are utilized to output a signal. I quickly realized that the 192kHz sans filtering offered less than acceptable performance. I experienced no serious operational issues with the Mercury. However, there were a few minor annoyances. The well illuminated and easily read display turned itself off 10 seconds after inputting a remote command. I would prefer the option of leaving it on. The plastic remote was relatively easy to master, with some extra buttons for a future preamp. However, it would have been nice to have a single button to directly access the various settings of the DAC rather than scroll through an on-screen menu - and a single button to open/close the disc drawer instead of two. Why have two buttons labeled open and close instead of a single button as just about every CD player on the market today sports? As with most cell phones, each key controls more than one letter for alpha-numerical inputs which can be a source of frustration for some. My Blackberry has a full QWERTY keyboard and is half the size of the Mercury's remote. Having said that, once I got to used to the remote, it was relatively simple to operate even when I had to manually input the artist name and album title of a disc that the Mercury's rather extensive database didn't recognize. I could direct-access my music library by tapping in the artist, composer or album title via the remote. It was not unlike accessing a contact on a cell phone. |
||||||||||
Depending on your system configuration, you'll probably want to use shielded interconnects with the Mercury - its PC-based components tended to generate some RF noise. For this reason I couldn't use my favorite SilverFi Samarkand interconnect which picked up all sorts of beeps, chirps and clicks which were clearly audible from my listening area between tracks and during relatively quiet passages. As Alvin alluded to above, the Mercury does not contain the same degree of shielding and power supply regulation as Zero One's separate Ti48/Ar38 combo. While the Mercury's rear cooling fan was quite loud while ripping discs, it quiets right down during playback and is essentially inaudible. I loaded up a few dozen discs during my time with the Mercury. Some recent favorites were Los Lobos' excellent The Town And The City [Hollywood 661] which is possibly their best album since Good Morning Aztlán; Elvis Costello's Delivery Man [Lost Highway 40011]; a fine recording of various Gershwin tunes [Harmonia Mundi HMU 807441]; Sir John Barbirolli with characteristically passionate performances of various chestnuts by Bax, Delius and Ireland [EMI 79984]; and a wonderful, both in sound and performance, jazz adaptation of Bach's Brandenburg Concertos by the Jacques Loussier Trio [Telarc 83644]. To say that playing tunes from the Mercury's hard drive was sonically superior to its CD transport is a gross understatement. The hard drive offered up far more low-level information and subtlety. I could hear far deeper into recordings and pull out all sorts of subtle strands of musical detail. There was also a beguiling degree of ease and naturalness that I almost never hear with any digital playback. Only CEC's belt drive players have competed in that regard. |
||||||||||
If I seem a little evasive about the Mercury's sonics, it's because with the myriad of user-programmable features of the chip set available, it was difficult if not impossible to identify a consistent sonic portrait. You want a well-lit open soundstage with terrific depth and detail, set it to 24/192kHz sampling and one of the higher filter settings. You want a raunchy, vigorous rendition with the emphasis on dynamics and forward propulsion, flip to 16/44.1 sans filtering. Want to tame an overly bright recording? Try setting it at 24-bit/176kHz and -3dB signal attenuation and perhaps one of the other dither settings. The features that exhibited the greatest influence on sonics were sample rate and filter settings. I struggled to hear any difference between 16 and 24-bit word lengths. Maybe there was a difference but it was neigh impossible to confirm that in quick A/B comparisons. The dither settings were also difficult to quantify but useful with some recordings. My overall preferred setting was 24/176kHz, purist filter without any dither. I also quite enjoyed 16-bit/44kHz sans filter. Even with the plethora of settings, I did observe some consistent sonics, however. The overall presentation regardless of settings was cohesive, clean, open, transparent and focused yet also relaxed, fatigue-free with exceptional depth, weight, inner detail and nuance. Beats and rhythms were spot on and I didn't observe anything that impeded the natural forward flow of music. The Mercury was one of the most impressive digital playback pieces I've ever reviewed. To date the only digital playback I've had in my home that I consider superior is Audiomat's Tempo 2.5 DAC paired with CEC's new TL53Z belt-drive player. This pairing is tonally fuller, more dynamic and organic, with excellent PRaT. But at nearly three times the price of the Mercury, it damn well better should be. Incidentally, both the Tempo and Mercury sport Burr-Brown's PCM1704 chipset which in my opinion was one of the best-sounding chips. It was also Burr-Brown's last multi-bit chip before they switched to delta-sigma designs which some folks claim don't sound as good. I have yet to hear a DAC or CD player I didn't like that featured the PCM1704, PCM63 or even venerable TDA1543. Many delta-sigma equipped players sound tipped up and slightly off in tonality, forward propulsion, PRaT or whatever you want to call the rhythmic/timing domain. To these ears, nothing drives a tune along like a good-old multi-bit DAC. It's interesting that many new chips utilize a hybrid delta-sigma/multi-bit architecture. |
||||||||||
The Mercury was also superb as a transport via its hard drive and even beat the belt-drive CEC TL53Z when I used both as transports with my Peter Daniel designed Audio Zone DAC-1. Backgrounds were quieter with more apparent detail. However, the CEC came quite close - but I'll have more to say on that fine player as well as Audiomat's Tempo in a future review. If you're thinking of using the Mercury as a standalone transpor onlyt, I'd recommend the Ti48 instead with its superior shielding and power supply regulation. |
||||||||||
In conclusion and minor foibles aside, I was impressed with the Mercury. It is the first hard drive-based playback component that I can heartily recommend and wouldn't mind owning myself. I could obtain whatever presentation I wanted via the plethora of playback settings and managing my software library was indeed a breeze. While I admire Zero One Audio's approach, my crystal ball indicates that they might want to consider adding a wireless and/or hardwire network link. While CDs will be around for some time yet, the future of music distribution is surely via the internet, hopefully DRM free with a choice formats including high-rez 24/192. In my | ||||||||||
perfect little audio-nerd world, I could download an album onto my computer along with liner notes, photos and other additional content, send the recording to a unit like the Mercury via wireless or cable, then disable the link for maximum sonics and either read the liner notes on my laptop or print out a hard copy. That way I can keep the computer hardware away from my music system and maintain the user flexibility and superior playback sonics of hard drives. It is a dream I nurture e but alas, based on the recording industry's activities of late, I'm not holding my breath for high-rez downloads. |
||||||||||
Quality of packing: Double boxed heavy cardboard. Reusability of packing: Excellent. Ease of unpacking/repacking: Very easy. Condition of component received: Casing screws were stripped by previous reviewer. Completeness of delivery: Perfect. Website comments: Site is informative with decent quality pictures and pricing info. Warranty: One year parts and labor plus 30-day money back home trial depending on location. Human interactions: Always quick, professional and helpful. Pricing: Exceptional value considering sound quality and user flexibility. Final comments & suggestions: None beside what I noted in the review. |
||||||||||
Manufacturer's website
|
||||||||||