This review page is supported in part by the sponsors whose ad banners are displayed below
The System
The focus for building my system originally was the source. I had already built up a modest system for family enjoyment but it was digitally based; however my old turntable and speakers happily co-existed with it. I thought about making step changes in the system which would allow me to take my time and continue listening to music with some elements of familiarity retained. This approach soon lost its way to an insatiable desire to go completely analogue for the sake of being more faithful from the ground up. In the mythology, the analogue sound is described as "natural", "warm", "organic" and "pure", yet these are no less attempts to capture the modus operandi with the science of language as if it were the very magic itself which could be bottled up by the alchemist and peddled by the apothecary. I do enjoy these notions of personality or the characteristics associated with analogue sound; they are helpful descriptions. But using a magic potion as a way of experiencing sound is not the same as accepting that the mode itself needn't have a prescribed sound at all; it is merely another belief in a means of getting closer to the real magic.

The magic potion is a shortcut to the dream and euphonic in nature but to have accuracy is to see beyond these preconceived notions and devices of language or else the approach would be less faithful a reproduction. After all I should not allow the language, however appealing, to get confused with neutrality and accuracy or the faithfulness I want for music recorded on vinyl. The more I thought about my system, the more I came to feel it was an all-or-nothing situation or else I would not be satisfying my aims. This of course may be an admirable ambition whether right or wrong. I later discovered that it was simply impractical to build an entire audio system from the ground up without some deviation from these principles. Choice, not withstanding ones' own infallible capability to make mistakes, meant that it would be a long though enjoyable road ahead and one which I still travel.

The Turntable
I had been using a NAD 533 with Rega RB250 tone arm (which is based on the Rega Planar footprint). I knew I wanted something more "robust" and with "more control". Despite knowing little about the science of sound reproduction. I was able to distinguish characteristics in this system which I felt could only be described as "under-performing". The soundstage was not well defined; placement of instruments was not always clear, the top end would "roll off', all leaving me frustrated; in short, an anti climax. However subjective my explanation, I knew instinctively it was not faithfully reproducing what had been recorded. I have of course no master tapes from which to disprove this assumption, but I knew also that the limitations which gave rise to the same characteristics being experienced across a host of different records made it a reasonably good assumption to make.

Musicality is very subjective of course so I wasn't too sure what specifically I should look for in a new turntable and how that might reproduce the sound I thought I wanted. I researched lots of turntables and narrowed my searches down to a few basic criteria: it had to be vintage (I like period styling so knew what I liked and didn't); I wanted British because I was interested in British audio heritage and because I knew there was a confidence in British audio engineering products of the past which would place me on a sound footing. I wanted a system with a challenge but which I didn't need to be an expert to tackle. I of course read reviews and got a sense for the common characteristics associated with certain turntable models and how they might fit with what I was looking for.

When I had finally drawn up a small list of popular and well respected turntables; a combination of looking at the projects undertaken by members of The Analog Dept, the wonderfully informative labour of love at No 6435 and a rather excellent article on a Garrard restoration project written by Jeff Day in the September 2004 edition of 6moons all eventually persuaded me to try a Garrard 301.

Without the rich wealth of information now made available on Garrard transcription motor units, all thanks to those early pioneers and revolutionaries, I could never have conceived of choosing a Garrard and breathing new life back into it. Before I found these labors of love twinkling in the depths of the audio underworld, I had of course been spellbound by the beautiful design of these decks. They seemed to have an affinity with my hankering for the nostalgic. I of course had heard the rumors of their class and what they could do; their heritage was indeed of pedigree.

The birth of the 301 in Swindon, England was of course a classically British affair and the 301's use for broadcasting purposes by the most enviable broadcasting corporation in the world only fuelled my desire to own one; it all played directly to my heart over my head. I cannot give a romanticized story of discovering a vintage Garrard in an old studio looking forgotten and shouting out for salvation; or of growing up close to this period of audio heritage. Like many before me, I found myself searching hard for a good example of this enviable motor unit and start the task of learning what to do with it. Before those early pioneers offered a way, these motor decks were almost forgotten despite their eminent history and pedigree. Of course many units were produced by the Swindon factory in its period since the 301 was launched in 1954 to the production of the 401 in 1965 and since in their restoration by dedicated enthusiasts.

The Garrard 301 remains a respected and revered motor unit which requires passion to breathe new life into. I felt confident that if I could pull this off, I would be rewarded like the pioneers before me had been. I was fortunate to find a Garrard which unlike many was in a reasonably good operable state. It looked clean, had all components present and short of learning how to use it and integrate it, I needed very little technical knowledge to get it off the ground. The unit needed a power cord, a replacement spark suppressor as the motor pulley and eddy current disc ran when the unit was plugged in at the mains but whilst in the 'off' position. The unit also ran fast, too fast and no adjusting of the eddy current brake was going to compensate for the speed at which it ran. A check of the linkage system soon resolved this problem. Besides these minor problems, the motor deck retained its 1950's elegance and robustness in a gloriously clean cream enameled finish, charming me with its period styling, the levers, the embossed control labels in silver and black and a heavy steel platter bejeweled with strobe markings. All cadmium-plated linkages were present, the motor suspension unit was in place as well as a perfectly operating motor, pulley, idler and brake disk, spindle bearing, thrust plate and electronics were also intact. I knew my vinyl was in for a treat.

Pictured below is the Garrard 301 I tracked down. It is an oil-bearing version (Schedule 51400/2: Serial 5902) with a 50Hz pulley.

It then followed quickly (almost naturally) that I should want to match this deck with a period tone arm, which was again sympathetic to my yearning for nostalgia, our British audio heritage and of a mechanical nature fitting with the deck. I had looked at Thomas Shick (a wonderfully elegant and highly respected tonearm), Shindo (truly a magician in the mountain - beautiful audio) and Ortofon arms (another classic) but eventually and not unlike many before me, decided I would be served well with an SME tone arm, another classic piece of British audio heritage with pedigree.